Post by Jan Willem StumpelThis subject sometimes comes up, but not nearly frequently enough
I think.
The web archives of this list at
http://mail.nl.linux.org/linux-utf8/ do not preserve utf-8
characters intact. This is absurd given the subject of this list.
Oh yes... (sigh)
Short summary of one particular thread trying to get this bug fixed:
Dec 2004: bug caught by me in Mhonarc 2.6.10, reported to author, and fixed
by the author in CVS nearly immediately.
Mar 2005: I asked the maintainers of nl.linux.org to apply this fix. No
reply for two weeks.
Mar 2005, two weeks later: sent this mail:
http://mail.nl.linux.org/linux-utf8/2005-03/msg00032.html
to this list. No worthful answer arrived to the list, but at least Bruno
Haible (co-founder of the list with Markus) forwarded this mail (cc'ing me)
to Rik van Riel (site admin) with a preface asking if he could fix this. Rik
replied:
"I will fix this once there's a new version of mhonarc
that has the bugfix. Playing around with a CVS version
might not be the best idea on such a large mail archive..."
Apr 2005: Bruno wrote me:
"Markus and I are the initiators of the linux-utf8 list. I'm glad that Rik
does the hosting and admin service for us, for five years. I don't think
that moving to a new list address (a small trouble for everyone) is worth
the trouble. Also, you know, anyone can create a list archive on his own.
For example, gmane.org carries archives of linux-utf8, but many messages
seem to be missing. The easiest way to fix the problem is therefore to
create an alternative archive of the list somewhere else."
May 2005: mhonarc 2.6.11 is released, including the fix. I sent this mail to
Rik and Bruno:
"Back to this topic we discussed two months ago:
There's a new official mhonarc release available which fixes the UTF-8 bugs.
Please upgrade to it and re-generate the mail archives so that the accented
letters show up correctly on the web archive."
No reply since then.
To summarize: I have a feeling that those people who could do anything for
this bug to get fixed do not care at all. :-( It's a two-byte fix that
should be applied to mhonarc, or it should be upgraded to a newer version
that fixes lots of other bugs, and the archives need to be re-generated,
which probably takes 2 minutes from the sysadmin's time (to find out the
proper command). Definitely much less time that I spent so far catching this
bug in mhonarc and typing all these e-mails...
Jan, I perfectly agree with you: "This is absurd."
--
Egmont